Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:09:31 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: mike@jellydonut.org, george+freebsd@m5p.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Subject: Re: statd/lockd startup failure Message-ID: <4D5F0A3B.1060305@dougbarton.us> In-Reply-To: <15348085.102038.1298052500896.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <15348085.102038.1298052500896.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/18/2011 10:08, Rick Macklem wrote: > The attached patches changes the behaviour so that it tries to > get an unused port for each of the 4 cases. Am I correct in assuming that what you're proposing is to (potentially) have different ports for all 4 combinations? I would suggest that this is not the right way to solve the problem. If I misunderstand, I apologize. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D5F0A3B.1060305>