Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:27:59 +0000 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_T=FCxen?= <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Cc: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: possible array out of bounds access in sys/netinet/sctp_output.c Message-ID: <4ED2731F.9040605@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <DDFFA8D0-F8BC-4153-BCBB-2146BB516785@lurchi.franken.de> References: <20111127154536.GA54043@freebsd.org> <20111127162430.GA95971@stack.nl> <DDFFA8D0-F8BC-4153-BCBB-2146BB516785@lurchi.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27/11/2011 16:52, Michael T=FCxen wrote: > the reason why we don't use addr_type[] is that the same code is used > on different plattforms and (at least at one point of time), using > addr_type[] didn't work there. Unfortunately I don't think even the Windows 8 Driver Kit will support=20 much more than stdint.h out of C99. --=20 Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ED2731F.9040605>