Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:58:56 +0200 From: Jan Srzednicki <w@expro.pl> To: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: RFC: Alternate patch to have true new-style rc.d scripts in ports (without touching localpkg) Message-ID: <20040817155856.GA28897@miranda.expro.pl> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0408170809f006b57@mail.gmail.com> References: <20040816155653.GA2405@rogue.acs-et.com> <20040817080812.GF37212@miranda.expro.pl> <790a9fff0408170809f006b57@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:09:25AM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:08:12 +0200, Jan Srzednicki <w@expro.pl> wrote: > > > > That's why my suggestion would be: /etc/rc.d/local/ (or > > /etc/rc.d/ports/, or whatever you want to call it). In this way you can > > easily separate both directories, and as new-style ports rc-scripts have > > to be placed in the new location, there is absolutely no confusion about > > them. Old scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d would be run with localpkg as > > they have been before. > > > Except this breaks for people who are NFS mounting /usr/local from > another machine, as the startup scripts are on the machine where the > port was originally installed, instead on in local/etc/rc.d. Which is > one of the purposes of putting them into local/etc/rc.d in the first > place. That can easily be fixed by a global make option (in /etc/make.conf) that would not install anything in /etc/rc.d/local/ and use old-style /usr/local/etc/rc.d, even if the system supports /etc/rc.d/local/. So it brings us to two make options - INSTALL_RCD and IGNORE_INSTALL_RCD (just a naming suggestion). /etc/rc.d/localpkg won't go away, so this seems to me to be a good solution. -- Jan 'wrzask' Srzednicki w@expro.pl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040817155856.GA28897>