Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 14:47:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>, Haikal Saadh <wyldephyre2@yahoo.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IBM supercomputer Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007031446530.55166-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <xzpwvj3skcm.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 Jul 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> writes: > > I think this is a common misconception. Windows NT did (does?) have a > > OS/2-like subsystem, but the resemblance ends there. > > Well, NTFS is a bastardized HPFS. They even use the same partition > type number and it's hard to tell them apart without actually trying > to mount them. There's a reason the NT installer will destroy any HPFS partitions it finds. Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007031446530.55166-100000>