Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:53:41 +0300 From: Subscriber <subscr1024@mail.ru> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WINE in jail [Was: i386_set_ldt and wine on AMD64] Message-ID: <4979D9F5.6020105@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <20081212145015.GE2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <32d8477c0612301410q2aaf9d39k859d242739554fd6@mail.gmail.com> <20061231003901.GA76688@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <ghtjp9$3j0$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081212130631.GC2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <49427649.20006@lapo.it> <20081212145015.GE2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hello, Kostik. I applied those patch to my 8C system about to or three weeks ago. But after applying patch I had xorg server became unstable. It was crashed occasionally with SIGBUS. Rebuilding xorg-server and all dependencies not made any effect. Can anybody know some info about this issue? Sorry for bad English. -- Cache Kostik Belousov пишет: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:33:45PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: >> Kostik Belousov wrote: >>> Hmm, so you have a wine on amd64 and willingness to test ? >>> Please, try >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/amd64_ldt.2.patch >>> patch is against HEAD. > The right URL is > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/amd64_ctx.2.patch > >> Here in the office I've got a 7.0-RELEASE-p6 (updated with >> freebsd-update binary updates) and I'm not willing to test a patch >> against -CURRENT on it, but I may consider configuring a different host >> at home just for the sake of testing it??? is the patch simply against >> HEAD by accident or does really depend on changes that are not available >> in 7-STABLE? > > I do not think that there is anything that prevents it from > being backported to 7, but probably it would require some handwork > for merge. > > You can install only HEAD kernel on the 7 machine, it should work with > RELENG_7 world.help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4979D9F5.6020105>