Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:40:01 -0800
From:      Tim Kientzle <kientzle@acm.org>
To:        Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ldconfig / dynamic linker hints library name conventions
Message-ID:  <3FD65D51.7090609@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <200312071603.29573.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> From the ldconfig manpage:
> 
> "Filenames must conform to the lib*.so.[0-9] pattern in order to
> be added to the hints file."
> 
> I wonder if there actually are any compelling reasons to keep this behaviour - 

Yes there are.  Not all shared libraries are meant to be seen
by ldconfig.  Some programs use shared libraries as
"plug-ins" that only get loaded under explicit control of
the program.  Allowing ldconfig to see them just puts garbage
in the hints file.



home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FD65D51.7090609>