Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 12:34:57 +1000 From: Emil Mikulic <emikulic@gmail.com> To: Charles Sprickman <spork@bway.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS: separate pools Message-ID: <20100504023457.GD7641@dmr.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1005032211590.35361@hotlap.local> References: <201005021536.05389.jafa82@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1005022124090.80153@ibyngvyr> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1005032211590.35361@hotlap.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:16:57PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote: > Just some random data. I know when I was reading about ZFS I did > come across some vague notion that zfs wanted the entire drive to > better deal with queueing, not sure if that was official Sun docs or > some random blog though... ZFS on Solaris only enables write caching when it's given an entire disk. pjd@ has stated that this does not affect FreeBSD, only Solaris.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100504023457.GD7641>