Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:03:44 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: The case for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20050210060344.GA54763@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <420AF652.7040308@mac.com> References: <200502061104.37960.reso3w83@verizon.net> <68a08ad2f9cff22dfa603b47311158cd@beforever.com> <20050209145329.GA27679@wirehub.nl> <20050209.082507.35867907.imp@bsdimp.com> <420AF652.7040308@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Feb 10), Chuck Swiger said: > M. Warner Losh wrote: > >In message: <20050209145329.GA27679@wirehub.nl> > > Robert Joosten <rjmlist@xs4all.nl> writes: > >:> Besides, it sounds like CVSUP will soon be replaced by something > >:> much more efficient. > >: > >: http://subversion.tigris.org/ ? > > > > He said something more efficient. cvsup is extremely efficient in > > using all the bandwidth available to it, in both directions. > > subversion, while it has many other virtues, hasn't optimized the > > transport layer to such a large extent... > > A good point. On the other hand, Subversion removes the need to > perform network access to do common operations like diff and > annotate. That's invaluable for people who use a laptop while > commuting and are w/o network access for a time. That's what cvsup does, you know :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050210060344.GA54763>