Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 17:36:36 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: eivind@yes.no (Eivind Eklund) Cc: michaelh@cet.co.jp, tlambert@primenet.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: May 17th UP machine 'panic' Message-ID: <199805252236.RAA10906@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <19980525140435.34553@follo.net> from Eivind Eklund at "May 25, 98 02:04:35 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, May 25, 1998 at 08:55:44PM +0900, Michael Hancock wrote: > > The argument should be p or curproc depending on whether or not an > > appropriate proc p is defined. I suppose you could just search and replace > > adding curproc, but that's ugly. We might have to bite the bullet and do > > it sometime later. > > If the problem is only the amount of work with doing the actual, > physical replacements, I can do that. I estimate it to less than 6 > hours of work (that's approx 1 minute 12 seconds per entry :-) > > If the problem is deciding if this is the way to go, that's something > I can't help much with - I don't know the interactions in this area > well enough. > It is a very good idea to explicitly pass down curproc. I am still working on SMP issues, and I believe that it will be a good investment. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805252236.RAA10906>