Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 07 Mar 2015 14:30:26 +0100
From:      Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>
To:        "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@freebsd.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org, scsi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sa(4) driver changes available for test
Message-ID:  <54FAFD72.4080704@omnilan.de>
In-Reply-To: <20150219001347.GA57416@mithlond.kdm.org>
References:  <20150214003232.GA63990@mithlond.kdm.org> <20150219001347.GA57416@mithlond.kdm.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig8E6262DF2F82D76D7986ED99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 Bez=FCglich Kenneth D. Merry's Nachricht vom 19.02.2015 01:13 (localtime=
):
> I have updated the patches.
>
> I have removed the XPT_DEV_ADVINFO changes from the patches to head, si=
nce
> I committed those separately.
>
> I have (hopefully) fixed the build for the stable/10 patches by MFCing
> dependencies.  (One of them mav did for me, thanks!)
>
> Rough draft commit message:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~ken/sa_changes_commitmsg.20150218.1.txt
>
> The patches against FreeBSD/head as of SVN revision 278975:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~ken/sa_changes.20150218.1.txt
>
> And (untested) patches against FreeBSD stable/10 as of SVN revision 278=
974:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~ken/sa_changes.stable_10.20150218.1.txt

Hello,

on 26/02/2105, r278964 seems to be part from the sa_changes patchset.
Do you have a sa_changes.stable_10.20150226 ready?
Or is it just a matter of exluding all parts, comitted with r278964=20
from the patchset?
I've done so in the mean while:
ftp://ftp.omnilan.de/pub/FreeBSD/OmniLAN/misc/sa_changes.stable_10.201502=
26.fudge.patch

Noticed that in sys/dev/mps/mps_sas.c 'cdai.flags' gets conditionally
(#if __FreeBSD_version >=3D 1100061) the new "CDAI_FLAG_NONE", while in
sbin/camcontrol/camcontrol.c, this is unconditionally used. Haven't
really looked at the code, mostly because my skills wouldN#t allow me to
answer this qusteion myself, but is that versioncheck in mps_sas.c still
vaild with the rest of the sa_driver-changes?

Thanks,

-Harry


--------------enig8E6262DF2F82D76D7986ED99
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlT6/XgACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8hYdQCgqeV5CmoPFyz60K3Nio7gVXSM
0boAn0U8uT2dR93gN3i0KVwqVAtD1+Np
=8H3a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig8E6262DF2F82D76D7986ED99--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54FAFD72.4080704>