Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:24:37 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Serious server-side NFS problem Message-ID: <199912162024.NAA73705@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Dec 1999 18:32:44 %2B0100." <16722.945365564@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <16722.945365564@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <16722.945365564@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : If people do a "settimeofday" we change the boot time since the : amount of time we've been up *IS* known for sure, whereas the boottime : is only an estimate. There is one problem with this. The amount of uptime isn't the same as the amount of time since the machine booted. How can this happen? When a laptop suspends, it doesn't update the update while it is asleep, nor does it update the uptime by the amount of time that has been slept. IS this a bug in the apm code? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912162024.NAA73705>