Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:56:27 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu> To: Rob LA LAU <freebsd@ohreally.nl> Cc: Guido Falsi <madpilot@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Message-ID: <YZOOWyVk6keZNhCe@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl> References: <fb5e514d-1458-9b49-1882-b64d5386cdfa@madpilot.net> <YZFGCoblQOHPnPWe@fc.opsec.eu> <e07b5a48-3465-c92b-ee4b-f2fc91e0202f@madpilot.net> <YZFXby/ktthO9Khx@fc.opsec.eu> <bc50a61a-1341-0c70-c427-f1717e2d871a@FreeBSD.org> <c23b8f2e-a2c5-a8e4-1fdd-db2b62404651@ohreally.nl> <e501cb86-9183-af4f-600f-c0fbe91c9c87@FreeBSD.org> <455ffbd8-2406-7c75-718c-759da5bab52c@ohreally.nl> <0415769b-ac3d-86d0-54c4-1f0a74db0b13@FreeBSD.org> <564fc06c-563e-a295-71f3-968a4acf08bb@ohreally.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > On 15/11/2021 10:21, Guido Falsi wrote: > > You look too worried by the "functionality added" part. > > Yes, I am worried. Of course I am. > When I first asked my question the day before yesterday, the first > responses were in the line of "port maintainers can do whatever they > want", accompanied by emoticons with sunglasses. At least I did not understand your question as a topic on security, but rather on: What are the rules for a port... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YZOOWyVk6keZNhCe>