Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:56:11 -0600 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6, ntpd, and kpasswdd Message-ID: <20050811145611.GI8060@hex.databits.net> In-Reply-To: <1123727977.1382.7.camel@server.mcneil.com> References: <1123727977.1382.7.camel@server.mcneil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--wnJX2LVqXtdJquW1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:39:37PM -0700, Sean McNeil wrote: > Question: Is an anycast address multicast? If so, shouldn't ntpd say No. Although both anycast and multicast addresses are many-to-one mappings, anycast endpoints are intended to be communicated with one at a time (depending on your network location), whereas multicast endpoints are all communicated with simultaneously. You'll probably need to dig in the code to figure out why you can't bind to an anycast address. Regards, --=20 wca --wnJX2LVqXtdJquW1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC+2cLF47idPgWcsURAkp7AJ9fOI5WQlrC3lzJsSCJdciftnBWgwCfb99Y bDQOoWBpU0ebG10gNiVW7lI= =UCb1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wnJX2LVqXtdJquW1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050811145611.GI8060>