Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 08:51:01 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> To: "Lucky Green" <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: save-entropy "route: not found" Message-ID: <200305010751.h417p1QL023994@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 May 2003 00:36:55 PDT." <00c701c30fb4$7140fc00$6601a8c0@VAIO650>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Lucky Green" writes: > We have a winner. The script doesn't like the route entry in the rc.conf > file of my test box: > ---------- > ifconfig_xl0="inet 208.201.229.161 netmask 255.255.255.0" > defaultrouter="208.201.229.1" > hostname="cheesy.cypherpunks.to" > > ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.1.110 netmask 255.255.255.0" > route -n add -net 192.168.1 192.168.1.110 -interface fxp0 > ---------- $ man rc.conf # check out the second paragraph. > This server has two NICs. An external NIC and internal NIC. The machine > does not act as a gateway or NAT; that functionality is handled by > dedicated hardware. The reason why this server has two NICs is to permit > me to offer SAMBA only on the inside while still being able to access > the box from the Internet without having to go through the NAT. > > What changes do I need to make to rc.conf that will allow me to still > both reach the Internet and the internal network from the server while > making save-entropy happy? $ man rc.conf # look for static_routes M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305010751.h417p1QL023994>