Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:44:27 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r200743 - in head/usr.sbin: . service Message-ID: <ygeaaxcfqdw.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <4B2E84CF.2060902@FreeBSD.org> References: <200912200134.nBK1YCAA048942@svn.freebsd.org> <yged42ackpc.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <4B2DBB51.9060002@FreeBSD.org> <ygebphuceaw.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <4B2DD2A1.8060907@FreeBSD.org> <ygeaaxec7oz.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <4B2E84CF.2060902@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
>>>>> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:10:55 -0800
>>>>> Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> said:
dougb> I agree to making the change you suggested, but I would like to
dougb> quibble over the format. Isn't the attached patch equivalent, and
dougb> simpler? What is the value of setting HOME and PATH in the environment
dougb> if we're just going to use 'env -i HOME PATH' anyway?
Yup, your attached patch is equivalent. However, I prefer the
previous one. In anyway, I don't have a strong opinion around here.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygeaaxcfqdw.wl%ume>