Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 00:31:29 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: mark@grondar.za Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, markm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: perl and other fixes to bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <199808100731.AAA25330@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199808100710.JAA09630@gratis.grondar.za> (message from Mark Murray on Mon, 10 Aug 1998 09:10:04 %2B0200)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Ah! I got confused, and was assuming that 2.2.6 was the final * release in 2.2.*. Oh. Also, remember we will have to support 2.2.8 for quite awhile (at least until 3.1 is out) with packages-stable. * > (2) The add-on packages (p5-* ports) will remain in the ports tree, so * > I don't understand why perl5 going into /usr/src has anything to * > do with the situation. * * I am going to nuke all references to the version number in directory names. You mean you're going to change the perl5 port as well as the version imported to /usr/src to be like the previous version (i.e., no version numbers in directories)? By the way, I'll really appreciate it if you can tell me these things beforehand. I was completely blindsided by the new perl5 commit which broke over a hundred ports. I just spent a couple of hours fixing up devel/p5-* (testing the new bsd.port.mk too, of course). Now you're telling me it was all unnecessary? ;) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808100731.AAA25330>