Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:30:04 -0800 (PST) From: Scott Blachowicz <Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/15423: update mail/nmh port to nmh-1.0.2 Message-ID: <199912221730.JAA17950@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/15423; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Scott Blachowicz <Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Subject: Re: ports/15423: update mail/nmh port to nmh-1.0.2 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:24:06 -0800 Hi- It's been brought to my attention that I goofed in constructing that patch. I removed the 'patches/patch-ad' file from the port, but that fact didn't make it into my submitted patch. I'm not sure how that normally gets handled (use 'diff -N' to create patch & expect 'patch -E' to get used later?). Is there anything else I need to do at this point aside from sending this message? Should I resubmit a patch? Sorry, Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org wrote: > > >Number: 15423 > >Category: ports > >Synopsis: update mail/nmh port to nmh-1.0.2 > >Confidential: no > >Severity: non-critical > >Priority: low > >Responsible: freebsd-ports > >State: open > >Quarter: > >Keywords: > >Date-Required: > >Class: change-request > >Submitter-Id: current-users > >Arrival-Date: Sat Dec 11 13:00:01 PST 1999 > >Closed-Date: > >Last-Modified: > >Originator: Scott Blachowicz > >Release: FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386 > >Organization: > none > >Environment: > > FreeBSD > > >Description: > > Update port to most recent version of the nmh software. Following > changes made to port: > > 1) Updated to nmh-1.0.2 from nmh-1.0. > 2) No longer have the added complexity of patching "-libdir" > option to be "-libexecdir", since everything that gets > installed to the nmh "libdir" need to go to "libexec". Just > set -libdir=PREFIX/libexec instead. > 3) Now run autoconf via USE_AUTOCONF flag instead of trying to > patch both autoconf input & output files. > 4) Removed what appears to be an ineffective attempt to patch > things to do FLOCK_LOCKING instead of DOT_LOCKING (when it > should be using dot locking anyways). > 5) Tweaked DESCR to make it more obvious this is a MUA package. > > >How-To-Repeat: > > > > >Fix: > > Apply patch: > ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912221730.JAA17950>