Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 14:09:49 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange top(1) output Message-ID: <20050514190949.GC1519@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <42848CD4.50501@mac.com> References: <cswiger@mac.com> <E1DWDNe-0005AE-3p@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <20050512.220006.124086156.imp@bsdimp.com> <42847665.4030803@mac.com> <20050513102116.GD9642@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <42848CD4.50501@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 07:17:40AM -0400 I heard the voice of Chuck Swiger, and lo! it spake thus: > > Agreed. The question to answer, is how should one display the > busiest threads of a process usefully in the top display? Figuring > that one out would be useful to answering other questions about what > top should look like. Are we even yet coming up with a CPU% on threaded processes (or the threads individually) for the question to be meaningful? I'm not running -CURRENT at the moment, but I don't recall seeing a commit... -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050514190949.GC1519>