Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:46:10 +0400
From:      Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: r245741 (clang as cc) can not build binaries for GEODE processor
Message-ID:  <1079015997.20130222194610@serebryakov.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20130222142623.389445fe@mr129166>
References:  <108875110.20130222104603@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CA%2Bt49PKwRUA97q9UV5Y3X7BUVKOWOJ9FhiGq2YgqnfV687ur_g@mail.gmail.com> <1812992178.20130222164558@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20130222142623.389445fe@mr129166>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Patrick.
You wrote 22 =D1=84=D0=B5=D0=B2=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BB=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., 17:26=
:23:

>>  It is latter, but IMHO, _without_ any CPUTYPE set, system compiler
>> should generate generic enough binaries to run on all supported CPUs
>> of target platform (i386 in this case).
PL> Clang should work now if march=3Dgeode (see:
PL> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D11212 )
  It is why SYSTEM, which is built with this option, works. But ports,
 built for "generic i386" doesn't :(

PL> But I agree that by default on i386, the code should work on
PL> i386... Looks like this is not true anymore (>=3D i686 ?).
 geode is fully i586 compatible, AFAIK, so yes, it looks like >=3D i686
:(

--=20
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1079015997.20130222194610>