Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 05:37:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219767] [NEW PORT] devel/python-dateutil: Extensions to the standard Python datetime module Message-ID: <bug-219767-21822-o9DjeVGzam@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-219767-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219767 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |matthew@FreeBSD.org |org | Resolution|FIXED |Rejected CC| |python@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Assign to committer that resolved and use correct(er) resolution (FIXED means change made/committed). This is a good example of why Python ports must be named exactly after their upstream counterparts, ugly (py, python-) prefixes/suffixes and all. Renaming py-dateutil has been on the todo list for a while but given the number of existing dependencies has taken a backseat. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-219767-21822-o9DjeVGzam>