Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 13:33:15 +1200 From: James Pole <james.pole@paradise.net.nz> To: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tar broken for large files? Message-ID: <200205181333.15145.james.pole@paradise.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <3539C7B0-69F8-11D6-84C0-00039312C852@automagic.org> References: <3539C7B0-69F8-11D6-84C0-00039312C852@automagic.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 18 May 2002 12:43, Joe Abley wrote: > On Friday, May 17, 2002, at 07:26 , Bjoern Fischer wrote: > > On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:56:21AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > >> also, how about using pax ? > > > > What about propagating pax(1) and wrap the tar(1) command line > > interface into pax for compatibility. > > OpenBSD's tar is pax, fwtw. Has been for a long time. > How compatiable is pax in both OpenBSD and FreeBSD to the present tar in=20 FreeBSD and the current gtar? --=20 James Pole - www.jamespole.cjb.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205181333.15145.james.pole>