Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 03:13:02 +0900 From: Masafumi =?iso-2022-jp?B?TkFLQU5FLxskQkNmOiwybUo4GyhC?= <max@wide.ad.jp> To: kuriyama@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: max@wide.ad.jp Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/japanese/sj3 Makefile ports/japanese/sj3/files md5 ports/japanese/sj3/patches patch-ab patch-ac patch-ad patch-ae patch-af patch-aa ports/japanese/sj3/pkg DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <19981011031302A.masafumi@aslm.rim.or.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 8 Oct 1998 23:10:47 -0700 (PDT)" <199810090610.XAA22532@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <199810090610.XAA22532@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> kuriyama 1998/10/08 23:10:47 PDT
> Modified files:
> japanese/sj3 Makefile
> japanese/sj3/files md5
> japanese/sj3/patches patch-aa
> japanese/sj3/pkg DESCR PLIST
> Added files:
> japanese/sj3/patches patch-ab patch-ac patch-ad patch-ae
> patch-af
> Log:
> The current japanese/sj3 (sj3-2.0.1.13) has a security bug of sj3serv.
> sj3-2.0.1.20 has already been released. In the version one, the bug
> was fixed.
Other than that, this port, IMO, has been way too messed up. It never
respects the ${PREFIX} setting, and I think there was some problems
with how it uses imake or xmkmf.
Since this one doesn't use X, I don't think it's appropriate to make
it depend on X (which is because this port has USE_IMAKE defined).
As there are some other ports that use Imake but not X, I've been
thinking of providing port of imake+xmkmf. Maybe we should look at
sj3 port again after the port freeze is over, and after I (or whoever
does the job faster) make devel/imake port.
Cheers,
Max
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981011031302A.masafumi>