Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:42:05 -0800 From: "Murray Stokely" <murray@stokely.org> To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r186204 - head/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/hardware Message-ID: <2a7894eb0812170942w6f8eed41h23b192648aba4d35@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <a31046fc0812162331h68c6b824tee92a926f05f12d1@mail.gmail.com> References: <a31046fc0812162331h68c6b824tee92a926f05f12d1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've got a report now of FreeBSD/amd64 working fine with 64GB, so we
can increase this limit to at least that amount. The 8GB dimms
required for 128GB configurations are, I understand, harder to come by
until recently.
This page you provided appears to be the specs for a hardware system
with many operating systems (but not FreeBSD) listed. I'm aware of
such systems, but I want to make sure we have a report of FreeBSD
actually working well on such hardware. Do you know of FreeBSD
working on this system you provided?
Thanks,
- Murray
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:31 PM, pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> wrote:
> The largest tested memory configuration I ever heard was with 128GB
> running on current :p.
> Link to conf (in russian): http://www.etegro.com/rus/items/24/2.html
>
> --
> wbr,
> pluknet
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2a7894eb0812170942w6f8eed41h23b192648aba4d35>