Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 12:01:29 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ISA-PnP w\o BIOS support? Message-ID: <199805091801.MAA19915@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199805090644.XAA00836@antipodes.cdrom.com> References: <199805080315.VAA12411@mt.sri.com> <199805090644.XAA00836@antipodes.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > This is (IMO) bogus. Stuff set in the kernel configuration file is no > > > easier to manipulate than sysctl variables. > > > > Sure it is. I know how things are setup in the kernel config files. I > > Ah, so "easier" means "easier for me". I think you'll find that most > people consider an interactive configuration process a lot "easier" > than having to install and build the kernel sources. Actually no. Most people are annoyed at the Linux 'interactive' process once they use the FreeBSD process. I can give you boatloads of email that shows this. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805091801.MAA19915>