Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      	Sat, 19 Oct 1996 13:30:47 +1000
From:      Andrew Tridgell <tridge@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
To:        terry@lambert.org
Cc:        julian@whistle.com, Guido.vanRooij@nl.cis.philips.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: fix for symlinks in /tmp (fwd) FYI
Message-ID:  <96Oct19.133056%2B1000est.65234-172%2B1149@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <199610190242.TAA02619@phaeton.artisoft.com> (message from Terry Lambert on Fri, 18 Oct 1996 19:42:03 -0700 (MST))

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry wrote:
> Actually, PSIX does mandate sticky bit behaviour in directories.

sure, but does it mandate that the rules for when a user can follow a
symlink? That doesn't sound like a POSIX thing to me, more of a
"tradition" thing. I could easily be wrong :-)
 
Does anyone on the CC list have the relevant POSIX docs handy?

> The historical BSD behavior is group inheritance, actually, totally
> unrelated to the behaviour needed for the bug (I think).

Hmmm, I thought group inheritance was controlled by the setgid bit on
directories? 

Does the t bit really affect group inheritance in BSD? 

I'll have to dig out my NetBSD kernel sources soon :-)

Cheers, Andrew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96Oct19.133056%2B1000est.65234-172%2B1149>