Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:58:45 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <TrimYourCc@NUXI.com> To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND Message-ID: <20010219005845.C95040@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010219002634.J6641@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 12:26:34AM -0800 References: <200102190547.WAA12829@usr05.primenet.com> <3A90CA94.D7CBCB65@softweyr.com> <20010218233916.J28286@lizzy.bugworks.com> <20010218235023.A95040@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010219002634.J6641@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 12:26:34AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> There's that, but where's the years of auditing and real world use
> to back up the decision to include this code in our base system?
The next major version of BIND is a complete re-write. So all the
auditors will have to start from scratch. So your argument doesn't hold
so well.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010219005845.C95040>