Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:52:49 +0200 From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS Message-ID: <200503281852.50193.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <200503270049.j2R0nrWq098656@8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> References: <200503270049.j2R0nrWq098656@8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 27 of March 2005 01:49, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Dear port maintainers,
>
> The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
> LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
> LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
> each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports conflict with
> ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with
> them.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kris "Annoying Reminder Guy II" Kennaway
> LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER
> ==========================================================================
[snip]
> imake devel/imake-4 x11@FreeBSD.org
> imake devel/imake-6 x11@FreeBSD.org
[snip]
So this won't work:
On Monday 21 of February 2005 02:44, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Should the NO_LATEST_LINK in devel/imake-6 be removed? It's not going
> to conflict with imake-4 since only one of those packages is built on
> any given branch.
Should we wrap this in some X_WINDOW_SYSTEM if-check like this (for imake-6):
.if ${X_WINDOW_SYSTEM} != xorg
NO_LATEST_LINK=
.endif
Dejan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503281852.50193.dejan.lesjak>