Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 06:20:40 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha diskslice_machdep.c src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_cd.c scsi_da.c src/sys/contrib/dev/fla fla.c src/sys/dev/ata ata-disk.c atapi-fd.c src/sys/dev/ccd ccd.c src/sys/dev/ida ida_disk.c src/sys/dev/vinum vinumdaemon.c vinuminterrupt.c ... Message-ID: <17378.934777240@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 16 Aug 1999 08:48:23 %2B0930." <19990816084822.D799@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990816084822.D799@freebie.lemis.com>, Greg Lehey writes: >On Sunday, 15 August 1999 at 8:22:31 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >>> These calls are internal to vinum. Why should they go via BUF_STRATEGY? >> >> There are a number of things in the pipe line which makes use of the >> fact that the BUF_STRATEGY is used throught, one of these is the >> "struct ioreq" divorce from struct buf. > >Would you care to give us some details? At the moment, it seems >unlikely to affect a driver in its internal doings. The details are what I've told you earlier: struct ioreq will be isolated from the bulk of struct buf and BUF_STRATEGY is where it will be taken out and passed to the driver. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17378.934777240>