Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Aug 2020 10:14:14 -0400
From:      Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r364310 - in head/sys: kern vm
Message-ID:  <20200818141414.GC28906@raichu>
In-Reply-To: <8f9d96f9-ecbb-1ed9-5347-b4b25662a6a2@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202008171537.07HFb8a6058296@repo.freebsd.org> <8f9d96f9-ecbb-1ed9-5347-b4b25662a6a2@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 01:03:25AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 17/08/2020 18:37, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > Author: glebius
> > Date: Mon Aug 17 15:37:08 2020
> > New Revision: 364310
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364310
> > 
> > Log:
> >   With INVARIANTS panic immediately if M_WAITOK is requested in a
> >   non-sleepable context.  Previously only _sleep() would panic.
> >   This will catch misuse of M_WAITOK at development stage rather
> >   than at stress load stage.
> >   
> >   Reviewed by:	markj
> >   Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26027
> 
> I think that there is going to be a lot of fallout from this.
> Will you handle it?
> A warning from WITNESS is one thing, a panic is another.

Indeed, based on a few reports from freebsd-current I reverted the
commit.  It seems there are a number of places in CAM that will require
modification, particularly in async event handling.  Note that CAM doneq
threads execute handlers with TD_NO_SLEEPING.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200818141414.GC28906>