Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:44:02 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts.c Message-ID: <20011011154402.D44561@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <3BC534BB.C80A7B54@DougBarton.net>; from DougB@DougBarton.net on Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:57:15PM -0700 References: <200110101949.f9AJnUq39112@freefall.freebsd.org> <3BC534BB.C80A7B54@DougBarton.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:57:15PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > What was the overwhelming necessity of these two changes that required > them to be committed to the older branch? Have you tested the build with > a clean src and obj directory after your commit? And have you run a > system with these changes? In the past we have allowed MFC's to stale branches (that are stale not due to a declaration, but lack of interest) when one has the motivation to do so. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011011154402.D44561>