Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:16:31 -0600 From: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, Johannes Lundberg <johalun0@gmail.com>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: priority of paths to kernel modules? Message-ID: <1535127391.1488.23.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20180824153611.7F83C1AC@spqr.komquats.com> References: <20180824153611.7F83C1AC@spqr.komquats.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 08:35 -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > My idea, which I implemented locally and should probably create a > phab review, was to ifdef DRM in modules/Makefile. We could do this > too. Default not to build/install. > This seems like the obvious fix. I thought the whole point of all this is that we support drm2 on some platforms, but not x86 anymore. So to me that implies not building the modules by default on x86. -- Ian > --- > Sent using a tiny phone keyboard. > Apologies for any typos and autocorrect. > Also, this old phone only supports top post. Apologies. > > Cy Schubert > <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> or <cy@freebsd.org> > The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. > --- > > -----Original Message----- > From: Johannes Lundberg > Sent: 24/08/2018 01:08 > To: freebsd-current > Subject: priority of paths to kernel modules? > > Hi > > Since we now stuck with drm2 in base for a few more years I have an > idea > would make things much smoother for many of us, hugely reduce the > amount of > bug reports we get and I think would be beneficial in other ways too. > > Current I run with something like this in /boot/loader.conf > > module_path="/boot/modules.drm- > v4.16;/boot/modules;/boot/dtb;/boot/overlays" > > So I expect modules to be loaded in that order, with /boot/<mykernel> > LAST. > > However, if you look at this > sysctl kern.module_path > kern.module_path: > /boot/kernel;/boot/modules.drm- > v4.16;/boot/modules;/boot/dtb;/boot/overlays > > /boot/kernel is inserted first and probably modules in /boot/kernel > have > the highest priority. This is also proven by everyone wanting to use > drm*kmods that get drm.ko from base loaded instead of the installed > in > /boot/modules. > > Please correct me if I'm wrong but if my understanding is correct > this is a > flaw and /boot/<mykernel> should be inserted last so that any > overlays or > custom modules have higher priority than the default ones. > > I can imagine this is also useful when building custom modules and > you > don't want to overwrite or delete the default one in /boot/kernel... > > Cheers > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd > .org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd > .org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1535127391.1488.23.camel>