Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:46:00 +0200 From: Ronald Klop <ronald-freebsd6@klop.yi.org> To: Herve Quiroz <herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr>, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: updating my port to bsd.java.mk options Message-ID: <opr6vfqyhfegu5x0@outgoing.local> In-Reply-To: <20040422175758.GA30200@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> References: <opr6vb6clxegu5x0@outgoing.local> <20040422175758.GA30200@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:57:58 +0200, Herve Quiroz <herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr> wrote: > Ronald, > > Good initiative indeed! :) Thanks. > NEED_JAVAC has been deprecated as well. Now JAVA_BUILD (and respectively > JAVA_RUN) allows two values: 'jdk' or 'jre'. When JAVA_BUILD=jdk, it > means that a compiler is needed, which is the same as setting > NEED_JAVAC=yes as before. > > When nothing is set (neither JAVA_BUILD nor JAVA_RUN), bsd.java.mk > assumes the folloing default values: > > JAVA_BUILD= jdk > JAVA_RUN= jre Maybe this can be documented in bsd.java.mk. (Or is it already documented somewhere?) > So your patch is correct is this regard. You just need to remove the > NEED_JAVAC statement. I tested it on my box and it seems to work. I said > "seems" because I have a build error. I've attached the log just in > case. I haven't got enough time to debug it myself at the moment so if > you know the problem, please tell me (I'll investigate myself in a few > days otherwise). I see the same problem. It's happens when NEED_JAVAC is removed. I'll investigate this later, because I have a basketball game to win in half an hour. Ronald. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opr6vfqyhfegu5x0>