Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:50:16 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-R ? 6-Stable ? 5.5-R ? Message-ID: <20060629175016.GB16946@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <cone.1151602734.91656.85564.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20060607222351.GA66870@math.jussieu.fr> <cone.1151482154.336836.14057.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com> <20060628081752.GA24060@rink.nu> <cone.1151485897.935309.14057.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com> <20060628092825.GB24060@rink.nu> <cone.1151490195.61571.14057.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com> <20060628110237.GS79678@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <cone.1151602734.91656.85564.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 01:38:54PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > I am really wondering if 6.1 is ready for production under heavy load. And > for sure the NFS client in the whole 6.X line seems problematic (see my > post in the stable list under subject: NFS clients freeze and can not > disconnect). It's not easily possible for a FreeBSD developer to put these kinds of stresses on a machine, so we rely on our users to help us with these problems. In particular, if it is possible for people to create synthetic workloads based on their own codebases, on non-production machines, these problems are more likely to be solved. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060629175016.GB16946>