Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:11:09 +0100 From: Anders Andersson <anders@hack.org> To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Naming cheme for GNOME2 ports Message-ID: <20020212191109.GC228@sushi.sanyusan.se> In-Reply-To: <B88EC14E.5D8E%ade@FreeBSD.org> References: <3C695911.5BAB5E89@FreeBSD.org> <B88EC14E.5D8E%ade@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 12:55:42PM -0600, Ade Lovett wrote: > On 02/12/02 12:04, "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > What do people think about naming scheme for the GNOME2 core > > components that already have their GNOME1 counterparts in the tree > > (i.e. gnomefoo-1.x.x vs. gnomefoo-1.99.x)? Should we just add `2' > > suffix, or something like `-devel'? Any ideas are appreciated. > > I'd go for the '2' suffix, since we're eventually going to end up with > x11/gnome2 etc. Yes, the '2' suffix seems the best approach. -- Anders Andersson <anders@hack.org> UNIX, Networking and Security consultant +46 (0)705 87 53 35 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020212191109.GC228>