Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:21:40 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Thomas Moestl <tmoestl@gmx.net>, re-builders@FreeBSD.org, Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: Something's wrong with ports/devel... Message-ID: <20030110232140.GA29368@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030110180806.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030110225059.GF1732@crow.dom2ip.de> <XFMail.20030110180806.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 06:08:06PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > Doh, that does of course break the substitution if _CPUCFLAGS is > > indeed defined. More correct is: > > How about using NO_CPUCFLAGS? That's what it exists for. As you discovered, no it isn't :-) Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+H1WEWry0BWjoQKURAgdxAKD7QUvESDC6816hLBlkkHNnOGpODgCcCj7u rFm3n+EAtld+0Pmxo6cbgNA= =+coa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030110232140.GA29368>