Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:03:14 -0700
From:      Joe <j.harman@f5.com>
To:        <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-lists@be-well.ilk.org>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: how to read security advisories
Message-ID:  <etPan.530f7de2.5f5e7fd0.302e@shiny.int.lineratesystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <etPan.530f7979.6590700b.302e@shiny.int.lineratesystems.com>
References:  <etPan.530d0f9a.6b8b4567.3ab2@shiny.int.lineratesystems.com> <44fvn64qaf.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <etPan.530e13fb.3006c83e.302e@shiny.int.lineratesystems.com> <444n3kvhsy.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <etPan.530f7979.6590700b.302e@shiny.int.lineratesystems.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Builds which do not have the -p suffix in their release string do not hav=
e a patch level.

Or maybe it's more accurate to say =22If your release string does not con=
tain the -p suffix, your build is not from the patched security branch=22=
=3F =C2=A0

I'm sure you know better than I how to state this in a technically correc=
t way.

Thanks,

-joe
From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 27 18:09:15 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5A42535
 for <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:09:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6809B1437
 for <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:09:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s1RI99pE037365
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:09:09 -0700 (MST)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost)
 by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s1RI99jw037362;
 Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:09:09 -0700 (MST)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:09:09 -0700 (MST)
From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To: Joe <j.harman@f5.com>
Subject: Re: how to read security advisories
In-Reply-To: <etPan.530f7de2.5f5e7fd0.302e@shiny.int.lineratesystems.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1402271108410.37359@wonkity.com>
References: <etPan.530d0f9a.6b8b4567.3ab2@shiny.int.lineratesystems.com>
 <44fvn64qaf.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
 <etPan.530e13fb.3006c83e.302e@shiny.int.lineratesystems.com>
 <444n3kvhsy.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
 <etPan.530f7979.6590700b.302e@shiny.int.lineratesystems.com>
 <etPan.530f7de2.5f5e7fd0.302e@shiny.int.lineratesystems.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:09:10 -0700 (MST)
Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-doc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:09:15 -0000

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Joe wrote:

> Builds which do not have the -p suffix in their release string do not have a patch level.
>
> Or maybe it's more accurate to say "If your release string does not contain the -p suffix, your build is not from the patched security branch"? 
??
> I'm sure you know better than I how to state this in a technically correct way.

"Release strings without a -p suffix have not been patched."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?etPan.530f7de2.5f5e7fd0.302e>