Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 16:44:51 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/mount_cd9660 mount_cd9660.c Message-ID: <20031102163821.C7440@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20031101132253.L99567@root.org> References: <200311011558.hA1Fw7JO047355@repoman.freebsd.org> <200311011634.hA1GYq6M038488@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20031101132253.L99567@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 11:34:52 -0500 (EST) > > Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> wrote: > > > <<On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 11:10:44 -0500, Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> said: > > > > > > > FWIW, I did not want to remove the second copywrite, so it was moved > > > > into the comment section as stated above. > > > > > > That copyright notice was where it was for a reason. Please put it > > > back. > > > > Done, see your commit mail. > > What was the reason? The reason is to put a copyright in the object file. This has been broken in many other places, notably in most "main" files in src/bin. E.g., in cat/cat.c: %%% RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/bin/cat/cat.c,v Working file: cat.c head: 1.29 ... ---------------------------- revision 1.29 date: 2003/04/30 17:40:28; author: obrien; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0 We have to hide copyright[] for gcc33. :-( ---------------------------- %%% The commit log is wrong. We don't actually have to do this for gcc-3.3.1. Apparently the regression in gcc that required this was fixed before gcc-3.* was released. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031102163821.C7440>