Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:07:32 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org> Cc: "current@FreeBSD.org" <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default Message-ID: <20130713080732.GV85556@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC2DBD@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <20130712231637.GS85556@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC2DBD@ltcfiswmsgmb21>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +0000, Teske, Devin wrote: > On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have just committed (r253305) a change the make pkg_install not being built > > and installed by default on HEAD. > > > > If you are still relying on it, be careful and add WITH_PKGTOOLS=yes in your > > src.conf(5) > > I think while a good move, we need to allow a window of development to re-work other HEAD components. > > It might also be worth developing a lint-tool to make sure we get every last instance (both from C code and sh code) within our base before we motion to cut a release with this change. > > I for one am effected and will have to change things. If you are referring to bsdconfig's package management, it is not working anyway HEAD as we do not and will not provides any pkg_install for HEAD via any of the usual distribution process: http, ftp, CD. Secondly if I'm properly reading src.conf.5 bsdconfig is not installed by default, which means we have a non default code depending on a now non default code, I don't see a problem here, should I? regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlHhCsQACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Eys+ACaA5cu2Cf4c0Ye6maA3pFtQDWx 1dEAoIMvcZsXE1P69d6v8PrFQrvs5/WO =1Mgk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130713080732.GV85556>