Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:13:11 +0000 From: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk> To: Warner Losh <imp@rover.village.org> Cc: imp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 style.9 Message-ID: <20050107111311.GC18004@myrddin.originative.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20050106.122059.74757197.imp@harmony.village.org> References: <41DC60CD.8000802@wadham.ox.ac.uk> <20050105.145709.74659919.imp@harmony.village.org> <20050106101233.GL16316@myrddin.originative.co.uk> <20050106.122059.74757197.imp@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 12:20:59PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > I've actually given the matter a lot of thought, and simpler > definitely is better here. There are too many different kinds of > licenses in the tree (hundreds of variations to the standard BSD > license, the mit license, and all the my little pony licenses that > likely will be headache for us one day) to do anything other than > <license> </license>, which is what the - tag does for us > unobtrusively. Yeah, that's what I'd have assumed for the license but there are probably other things that could be marked up for processing as well. I think Doug's been using Doxygen in some places in the tree. > Having said that, if you are willing to step to the plate and do the > work necessary to make a more complex scheme work, be my guest. I'm > not presently planning on doing that. I don't mind doing some work in this area. My choice would be to use XML though since that's an universal technology that we're beginning to use in lots of other places as well, so to me it would make sense to keep to the one technology. -- Paul Richards
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050107111311.GC18004>