Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Mar 2002 15:33:09 +0000
From:      "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        green@FreeBSD.ORG, sw@anthologeek.net, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/lang Makefile ports/lang/icc Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/lang/icc/files patch-include
Message-ID:  <20020327153308.GA7219@FreeBSD.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <200203271402.g2RE2ch3017230@Magelan.Leidinger.net>
References:  <200203271333.g2RDXsZ96421@green.bikeshed.org> <200203271402.g2RE2ch3017230@Magelan.Leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:02:38PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> 
> I think Intel wants icc as an drop in replacement (sort of, it has
> -KPIC instead of -fPIC) to get better performance figures on Linux.
> 

-KPIC is System V Software Generation Subsystem.  Why GCC doesn't support
SGS flags/options is a mystery to me, considering GNU stuff was emphasised
on unix_sv for so long.

	/j.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020327153308.GA7219>