Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Apr 2013 11:56:30 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        lev@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New hardware, old problem: stuck beacon when here is WiFi traffic
Message-ID:  <CAJ-Vmonpc6rMKfT3qHme4Yzwkcj0zij8dYzXktpbz3bbSmT0=Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <777510536.20130427123352@serebryakov.spb.ru>
References:  <2810538978.20130423164137@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmom4UDoz7EgdnVeQ%2BALuFFXkH9t_Uj7=FwL77S5rKfUD1g@mail.gmail.com> <1813905823.20130423184528@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmomhRaKODxis09MjAhUbAUOw%2B6jWBY48JpZR_JgfZZLKcQ@mail.gmail.com> <184105677.20130424002002@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmokVmHDXwE7S5koSqtFjPXQ_VUPhj8gfMruDM2k-DyUMPw@mail.gmail.com> <1936997795.20130424003555@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmokx2QhcjcsgA-_kqjX63Vu4CLk7HkuyALautbnzp61ywQ@mail.gmail.com> <886711115.20130424004702@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmoksSTBC7jmC-_hvBeJFSD0k28HoZodaWdHm0AF0d1yZJg@mail.gmail.com> <6010292503.20130426001447@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmomUsPgHTVGaKHZ_YE%2Bu1ZOjGqrVfh2uYmvOs6gKmhnxOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokZBbmHbruKJV-8kvTyOTsiq5_XHnfqUYo3vO68872Q=w@mail.gmail.com> <99510815.20130426122508@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmoktRPbnDRbRuwA4i8w50kExs2pwD4yBawL6iOz7F4Bknw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonCao99MOrm97tQS_f1xS9tieQfg-nQUB4APWVmdJJUBg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmonxz3spCYeM5b3ijBgnM6wfjTa%2Bv5j8pbnX%2B-_Sg4hSGw@mail.gmail.com> <777510536.20130427123352@serebryakov.spb.ru>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On 27 April 2013 01:33, Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Hello, Adrian.
> You wrote 27 апреля 2013 г., 1:34:24:
>
> AC> You're not doing something like leaving bgscan enabled, or not
> AC> defining a channel up front?
>  Here is my config:
>
> ifconfig_wlan0="inet 192.168.135.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 mode 11ng channel 3:ht/40 -bgscan ssid home.serebryakov.spb.ru country DE regdomain row txpower 30"

Is it a bridge? If so, put an IP address on the bridge, not wlan0.

By putting inet <x> there early on, it's bringing the interface up
very early. It's a side effect of hte network stack - if you assign an
IP address, the VAP comes up immediately.

thus i do the inet line after _all_ other things are done, and on a
separate line.

Anyway, leave it how it is for now. Just update to the latest -HEAD
ath code and redo the testing. It will now log the whole TX queue
contents, not just the completed frames. Hopefully it'll be more
obvious.

Thanks,


adrian


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmonpc6rMKfT3qHme4Yzwkcj0zij8dYzXktpbz3bbSmT0=Q>