Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:02:25 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Subject: Re: Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD Message-ID: <20060526230225.GB946@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060526183554.25d5cc0d@kan.dnsalias.net> References: <20060526153422.GB25953@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20060526183554.25d5cc0d@kan.dnsalias.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 06:35:54PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > How does this compare to GCC 4.x mudflap feature? I do not plan to > include Propolice patch into base system any time soon and will object > anyone trying to do so due to future maintenance headaches this will > inevitably create. GCC 4.1.1 import is in the works though and should be > available shortly. > At one time mudflap would lead to internal compiler errors on amd64. I haven't tried it in a long time. What language frontends do you intend to support when 4.1.1 comes into the tree? FreeBSD currently has a Fortran 77 compiler via g77. g77 is no longer supported in the 4.x series, and its replacement is a Fortran 95 compiler. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060526230225.GB946>