Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:39:41 -0600 From: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: giffunip@tutopia.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVS removal from the base Message-ID: <4EE4DCCD.9090401@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201112111439.pBBEdXVI064559@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201112111439.pBBEdXVI064559@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/11/11 08:39, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > "Pedro F. Giffuni" wrote: >> Hi Daniel; >> >> --- On Sat, 12/3/11, Daniel Eischen<deischen@freebsd.org> wrote: >> ... >>> I would love to mirror the SVN repo in the same way >>> and have an 'svn' in base, or at least something that >>> could replace CVS in the above scenario. >>> >> I have to say I am surprised by all the people that >> still use CVS (for their own good reasons). >> >> It still would be helpful if cvs users could evaluate >> OpenCVS: it's been experimental for ages now. It does >> seem to have some advantage (other than the license) >> in that it's smaller and better maintained (or at >> least not too dead). > Did you test it with > cd /usr/src/release ; make release > > Cheers, > Julian For whatever it's worth, release(7) uses svn for src by default these days. -Nathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EE4DCCD.9090401>