Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 08:51:38 -0700 From: "Crist J . Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> To: Doug Poland <doug@polands.org> Cc: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu>, Matt Rudderham <matt@researcher.com>, ListServer FreeBSD Questions <FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG>, cjclark@reflexnet.net Subject: Re: kernel bloat Message-ID: <20001011085138.I25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> In-Reply-To: <NDBBKMNOJKJGAEKJNLIAAEJIELAA.doug@polands.org>; from doug@polands.org on Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:53:36AM -0500 References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010111013230.22407-100000@rac3.wam.umd.edu> <NDBBKMNOJKJGAEKJNLIAAEJIELAA.doug@polands.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:53:36AM -0500, Doug Poland wrote: > Thanks to all for the help... > > I've recompiled the kernel, commenting out the lines that > Crist suggested. The kernel is now down to 2301673 bytes. > That's a lot better than 7.1MB. > > Can anyone explain why, or is it even significant, when > Crist compiled it and came up with 1.8MB and my version > is 2.3MB? BTW, I'm using 4.1.1-RELEASE, and am not sure > what Crist is running on. [1266:~] uname -a FreeBSD 149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com 4.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE #0: Sun Sep 17 16:57:52 PDT 2000 root@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CJC-DESKTOP i386 But the source I used to build the kernel was CVSupped Saturday morning. I was not worried about a world-kernel sync for this test, but it doesn't seem like that would make a 500kB difference. What's in your /etc/make.conf, specifically, COPTFLAGS. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001011085138.I25121>