Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:10:41 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: groff alternative? Message-ID: <200504262010.49509@harrymail>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart3677596.j3orVY53Xm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello, I'm using NO_CXX in my make.conf to strip down the base system to ~50MB=20 including man pages. The only problem is that groff is missing if I don't=20 build c++, and even if I build groff itself and the needed libstdc++ it cos= ts=20 me about 10MB. If I just skip NO_CXX it's only 500k more, so I moved my=20 patches to /dev/null. Now I wrote a port for GNU/groff, but this also consumes 9974k by default a= nd=20 I don't want to include patches into that port to strip down groff, if that= =20 was possible at all. Does anybody know any alternative for the groff part to view man pages simp= ly=20 with the man command? It's horrible that the filter needs more space than a= ll=20 the manpages itself! And of course, even if I decide to leave system man pages outside the flash= =20 card I still may want to read man pages of installed packages (which is=20 another mountpoint on my installation, so there may be no space limit,=20 depending on the card and additional drives) Thanks, =2DHarry --nextPart3677596.j3orVY53Xm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCboQpBylq0S4AzzwRAv/OAJ9IaKsqhKfHdN0ppIh/6woMb07stQCePtag 5OsmtfYrKPaBtGKRKTX6cbo= =mOup -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3677596.j3orVY53Xm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504262010.49509>