Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:46:44 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: Philip M. Gollucci <pgollucci@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/syslinux Makefile Message-ID: <86pqwl95y3.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201009100626.o8A6Q8tB019809@repoman.freebsd.org> (Philip M. Gollucci's message of "Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:26:08 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <201009100626.o8A6Q8tB019809@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Philip M. Gollucci <pgollucci@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> pgollucci 2010-09-10 06:26:08 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> sysutils/syslinux Makefile
> Log:
> - Use IGNORE instead of BROKEN
> IGNORE will still try to be built on pointhat and tbs
Isn't it the other way around? Quoting bsd.port.mk:
# BROKEN - Port is believed to be broken. Package builds will
# still be attempted on the pointyhat package cluster to
# test this assumption.
...
buildanyway-message:
.if defined(TRYBROKEN) && defined(BROKEN)
@${ECHO_MSG} "Trying build of ${PKGNAME} even though it is marked BROKEN."
.else
@${DO_NADA}
.endif
And I can find build logs only for BROKEN ports on pointyhat.
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portsconcordanceforbroken.py
>
> Suggested by: danfe
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.7 +1 -1 ports/sysutils/syslinux/Makefile
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86pqwl95y3.fsf>