Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:43:00 +0100 From: Stuart Henderson <stuart@eclipse.net.uk> To: Mark Conway Wirt <mark@intrepid.net> Cc: Bryan Bunch <bryanb@walls-media.com>, "Mike Avery (on the road)" <mavery@mail.otherwhen.com>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why not uucp, instead of smtp and static ip? Message-ID: <3773B194.BAC2F717@eclipse.net.uk> References: <27FC8C472BE@mail.otherwhen.com> <000401bebf19$d3e5e860$3a7e060c@ntwksbry.walls-media.com> <19990625121841.R14126@intrepid.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Maybe they've improved the implementation in Exchange or Notes Exchange doesn't even let you use ETRN if you use an ISDN router. TURN used to let you turn the connection round and it would send all mail addressed to the host mentioned in the HELO, which does let you use a dynamic IP address but, as you might expect, there aren't many mail servers that allow that these days :-) Of course, if you are using Exchange or something similar, you can always compile yourself up an NT version of fetchmail using the cygwin libraries, and use that to pull POP3 (including use of Delivered-to so spam still gets to the right person :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3773B194.BAC2F717>