Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:59:45 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.org> To: Garance A Drosehn <gad@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib getenv.3 getenv.c putenv.c... Message-ID: <20070501185945.GB10323@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <p06240806c25d2d7872e6@[128.113.24.47]> References: <200705011602.l41G2iRx003626@repoman.freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0705011310490.2591@sea.ntplx.net> <p06240806c25d2d7872e6@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:53:17PM -0400, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > But I expect the fixes to *other* programs (such as usr.bin/env) > could be committed without causing any trouble for anyone. If > that's true, then we might as well leave those changes in. Yes, they could, they are backward-compatible. But I can't (read my answer to Daniel in this thread, why). I fear more people comes tempting to say like they are unneccessary or they leak memory or I can't imagine what. Feel free to restore what you like, perhaps you have better luck (or better communication skills?) than me. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070501185945.GB10323>