Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:35:28 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: Darrel <levitch@iglou.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc Message-ID: <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209031147260.6464@shell1> <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig97AF3886D483F337F5686015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Darrel <levitch@iglou.com> wrote: >> For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: >> svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports 404. There are no branches in the ports, in exactly the same way that there wasn't a RELENG_9 tag you could use in a ports supfile. Head is the only option with ports. On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as > opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used > with subversion. stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig97AF3886D483F337F5686015 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBE3FgACgkQ8Mjk52CukIykCACdEiuXB9asKqJWB0SAl7Q1ZT/f WgUAn2+9c/Nmlw6QklpmcB+f1KXjo6n3 =FCSt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig97AF3886D483F337F5686015--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5044DC50.7020806>