Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 11:00:23 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Michael Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libstand zalloc_defs.h Message-ID: <19981017110023.N469@freebie.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <199810161923.MAA13302@freefall.freebsd.org>; from Michael Smith on Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 12:23:38PM -0700 References: <199810161923.MAA13302@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, 16 October 1998 at 12:23:38 -0700, Michael Smith wrote: > msmith 1998/10/16 12:23:37 PDT > > Modified files: > lib/libstand zalloc_defs.h > Log: > Reduce the sbrk() increment from 64K to 4K. There's not much room on the > Alpha, and wasting potentially 64K-4 bytes of RAM just isn't an option. Am I misunderstanding the context here? This space is all virtual, isn't it? Why should an Alpha have less room than an i386? Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981017110023.N469>